Is Free Speech Racist?
Is Free Speech Racist?
The question of free speech is never far from the headlines and frequently declared to be in crisis. Starting from the observation that such debates so often focus on what can and cannot be said in relation to <i>race</i>, Gavan Titley asks why racism has become so central to intense disputes about the status and remit of freedom of speech. 

<i>Is Free Speech Racist?</i> moves away from recurring debates about the limits of speech to instead examine how the principle of free speech is marshalled in today’s multicultural and intensively mediated societies. This involves tracing the ways in which free speech has been mobilized in far-right politics, in the recycling of ‘race realism’ and other discredited forms of knowledge, and in the politics of immigration and integration. Where there is intense political contestation and public confusion as to what constitutes racism and who gets to define it, ‘free speech’ has been adopted as a primary mechanism for amplifying and re-animating racist ideas and racializing claims. As such, contemporary free speech discourse reveals much about the ongoing life of race and racism in contemporary society.
Show More
Buy Now


Order Exam Copy

For Lecturers Only

More Info
  • September 2020
  • 144 pages
  • 138 x 216 mm / 5 x 9 in
Available Formats
  • Hardback $45.00
  • 9781509536153
  • Paperback $12.95
  • 9781509536160
  • Open eBook $36.99
  • 9781509536177
Table of Contents
1 Debating racism, disputing speech
2 Closure: who decides what is racist?
3 Culture: who values free speech?
4 Capture: what is free speech being claimed for?
Afterword: So, is free speech racist?
About the Author
Gavan Titley is Senior Lecturer in Media Studies at Maynooth University.
Show More


"An excellent contribution to dispelling liberal myths that freedom of expression is impotent and unconditional, and to taking back freedom of expression. […] Titley's short and concise book [is] recommended for any anti-racist thinking and action."

“A significant contribution to our understanding [of how and why] the far- and racist right in many Western countries have with uneven but significant success managed to appropriate the language and rhetorics of free speech, and weaponize it for the purpose of mainstreaming racism and Islamophobia.”
Sindre Bangstad, Ethnic and Racial Studies

"[This book] is clear, manageable and does not reproduce that fakely neutral tone that some academic discourses on race do. It does not shy away from complexity either. This book is both a worthwhile contribution to the history of writing on racism and a timely publication considering recent events. Highly recommended."
Manchester Review of Books

"[O]ne of the clearest accounts that has yet been published of […] how free speech is being misused by those who have turned it into an ideology. […] It's lively, compelling and principled, and anyone who cares about the topic should buy a copy."
David Renton, lives; running

"A marvellously readable and yet intellectually rigorous exploration of how race, racism and freedom of speech have become so intensely intertwined in the western public sphere. Titley offers an illuminating account of how the so-called 'free speech crisis' is really a story of race, power and politics whereby vested interests have captured the very idea of the freedom to speak."
Priyamvada Gopal, Churchill College, University of Cambridge

"This important contribution embeds contemporary discussions of free speech into Critical Race Theory in subtle, well-argued ways. Titley exemplifies how racisms are advanced through the defense of freedom of speech, and how the latter is used as a blunt weapon to bludgeon efforts to tackle racist expression."
David Theo Goldberg, University of California, Irvine

"This is an excellent and urgently needed book that offers a key contribution to both academic and public debate on free speech. In a clear, succinct style, Gavan Titley persuasively argues that free speech is often defended in a superficial way, which focuses on speech as a mere channel of ideas and neglects structural inequalities between different speakers."
Matteo Bonotti, Monash University

Show More